351 lines
11 KiB
Rust
351 lines
11 KiB
Rust
![]() |
/*! A module for the protocol for a new user to redeem an Invitation
|
||
|
credential. The user will start at trust level 1 (instead of 0 for
|
||
|
untrusted uninvited users).
|
||
|
|
||
|
The user presents the Invitation credential:
|
||
|
- id: revealed
|
||
|
- date: blinded, but proved in ZK to be at most INVITATION_EXPIRY days ago
|
||
|
- bucket: blinded
|
||
|
- blockages: blinded
|
||
|
|
||
|
and a new Lox credential to be issued:
|
||
|
|
||
|
- id: jointly chosen by the user and BA
|
||
|
- bucket: blinded, but proved in ZK that it's the same as in the
|
||
|
Invitation credential above
|
||
|
- trust_level: revealed to be 1
|
||
|
- level_since: today
|
||
|
- invites_remaining: revealed to be 0
|
||
|
- blockages: blinded, but proved in ZK that it's the same as in the
|
||
|
Invitations credential above
|
||
|
|
||
|
*/
|
||
|
|
||
|
use curve25519_dalek::ristretto::RistrettoBasepointTable;
|
||
|
use curve25519_dalek::ristretto::RistrettoPoint;
|
||
|
use curve25519_dalek::scalar::Scalar;
|
||
|
use curve25519_dalek::traits::IsIdentity;
|
||
|
|
||
|
use zkp::CompactProof;
|
||
|
use zkp::ProofError;
|
||
|
use zkp::Transcript;
|
||
|
|
||
|
use super::super::cred;
|
||
|
use super::super::dup_filter::SeenType;
|
||
|
use super::super::{pt_dbl, scalar_dbl, scalar_u32};
|
||
|
use super::super::{BridgeAuth, IssuerPubKey};
|
||
|
use super::super::{CMZ_A, CMZ_A_TABLE, CMZ_B, CMZ_B_TABLE};
|
||
|
|
||
|
/// Invitations must be used within this many days of being issued.
|
||
|
/// Note that if you change this number to be larger than 15, you must
|
||
|
/// also add bits to the zero knowledge proof.
|
||
|
pub const INVITATION_EXPIRY: u32 = 15;
|
||
|
|
||
|
pub struct Request {
|
||
|
// Fields for showing the Invitation credential
|
||
|
P: RistrettoPoint,
|
||
|
id: Scalar,
|
||
|
CDate: RistrettoPoint,
|
||
|
CBucket: RistrettoPoint,
|
||
|
CBlockages: RistrettoPoint,
|
||
|
CQ: RistrettoPoint,
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Fields for the inequality proof
|
||
|
// date + INVITATION_EXPIRY >= today
|
||
|
CG1: RistrettoPoint,
|
||
|
CG2: RistrettoPoint,
|
||
|
CG3: RistrettoPoint,
|
||
|
CG0sq: RistrettoPoint,
|
||
|
CG1sq: RistrettoPoint,
|
||
|
CG2sq: RistrettoPoint,
|
||
|
CG3sq: RistrettoPoint,
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Fields for user blinding of the Lox credential to be issued
|
||
|
D: RistrettoPoint,
|
||
|
EncIdClient: (RistrettoPoint, RistrettoPoint),
|
||
|
EncBucket: (RistrettoPoint, RistrettoPoint),
|
||
|
EncBlockages: (RistrettoPoint, RistrettoPoint),
|
||
|
|
||
|
// The combined ZKP
|
||
|
piUser: CompactProof,
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
#[derive(Debug)]
|
||
|
pub struct State {
|
||
|
d: Scalar,
|
||
|
D: RistrettoPoint,
|
||
|
EncIdClient: (RistrettoPoint, RistrettoPoint),
|
||
|
EncBucket: (RistrettoPoint, RistrettoPoint),
|
||
|
EncBlockages: (RistrettoPoint, RistrettoPoint),
|
||
|
id_client: Scalar,
|
||
|
bucket: Scalar,
|
||
|
blockages: Scalar,
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
pub struct Response {
|
||
|
// The fields for the new Lox credential; the new trust level is 1
|
||
|
// and the new invites_remaining is 0, so we don't have to include
|
||
|
// them here explicitly
|
||
|
P: RistrettoPoint,
|
||
|
EncQ: (RistrettoPoint, RistrettoPoint),
|
||
|
id_server: Scalar,
|
||
|
level_since: Scalar,
|
||
|
TId: RistrettoPoint,
|
||
|
TBucket: RistrettoPoint,
|
||
|
TBlockages: RistrettoPoint,
|
||
|
|
||
|
// The ZKP
|
||
|
piBlindIssue: CompactProof,
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
define_proof! {
|
||
|
requestproof,
|
||
|
"Redeem Invite Request",
|
||
|
(date, bucket, blockages, zdate, zbucket, zblockages, negzQ,
|
||
|
d, eid_client, ebucket, eblockages, id_client,
|
||
|
g0, g1, g2, g3,
|
||
|
zg0, zg1, zg2, zg3,
|
||
|
wg0, wg1, wg2, wg3,
|
||
|
yg0, yg1, yg2, yg3),
|
||
|
(P, CDate, CBucket, CBlockages, V, Xdate, Xbucket, Xblockages,
|
||
|
D, EncIdClient0, EncIdClient1, EncBucket0, EncBucket1,
|
||
|
EncBlockages0, EncBlockages1,
|
||
|
CG0, CG1, CG2, CG3,
|
||
|
CG0sq, CG1sq, CG2sq, CG3sq),
|
||
|
(A, B):
|
||
|
// Blind showing of the Invitation credential
|
||
|
CDate = (date*P + zdate*A),
|
||
|
CBucket = (bucket*P + zbucket*A),
|
||
|
CBlockages = (blockages*P + zblockages*A),
|
||
|
// User blinding of the Lox credential to be issued
|
||
|
D = (d*B),
|
||
|
EncIdClient0 = (eid_client*B),
|
||
|
EncIdClient1 = (id_client*B + eid_client*D),
|
||
|
EncBucket0 = (ebucket*B),
|
||
|
EncBucket1 = (bucket*B + ebucket*D),
|
||
|
EncBlockages0 = (eblockages*B),
|
||
|
EncBlockages1 = (blockages*B + eblockages*D),
|
||
|
// Prove CDate encodes a value at most INVITATION_EXPIRY
|
||
|
// days ago: first prove each of g0, ..., g3 is a bit by
|
||
|
// proving that gi = gi^2
|
||
|
CG0 = (g0*P + zg0*A), CG0sq = (g0*CG0 + wg0*A), CG0sq = (g0*P + yg0*A),
|
||
|
CG1 = (g1*P + zg1*A), CG1sq = (g1*CG1 + wg1*A), CG1sq = (g1*P + yg1*A),
|
||
|
CG2 = (g2*P + zg2*A), CG2sq = (g2*CG2 + wg2*A), CG2sq = (g2*P + yg2*A),
|
||
|
CG3 = (g3*P + zg3*A), CG3sq = (g3*CG3 + wg3*A), CG3sq = (g3*P + yg3*A)
|
||
|
// Then we'll check that today*P + CG0 + 2*CG1 + 4*CG2 + 8*CG3 =
|
||
|
// CDate + INVITATION_EXPIRY*P by having the verifier
|
||
|
// plug in CDate + INVITATION_EXPIRY*P - (today*P + 2*CG1 + 4*CG2
|
||
|
// + 8*CG3) as its value of CG0.
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
pub fn request(
|
||
|
inv_cred: &cred::Invitation,
|
||
|
invitation_pub: &IssuerPubKey,
|
||
|
today: u32,
|
||
|
) -> Result<(Request, State), ProofError> {
|
||
|
let A: &RistrettoPoint = &CMZ_A;
|
||
|
let B: &RistrettoPoint = &CMZ_B;
|
||
|
let Atable: &RistrettoBasepointTable = &CMZ_A_TABLE;
|
||
|
let Btable: &RistrettoBasepointTable = &CMZ_B_TABLE;
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Ensure the credential can be correctly shown: it must be the case
|
||
|
// that date + INVITATION_EXPIRY >= today.
|
||
|
let date: u32 = match scalar_u32(&inv_cred.date) {
|
||
|
Some(v) => v,
|
||
|
None => return Err(ProofError::VerificationFailure),
|
||
|
};
|
||
|
if date + INVITATION_EXPIRY < today {
|
||
|
return Err(ProofError::VerificationFailure);
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
let diffdays = date + INVITATION_EXPIRY - today;
|
||
|
// If diffdays > 15, then since INVITATION_EXPIRY <= 15, then date
|
||
|
// must be in the future. Reject.
|
||
|
if diffdays > 15 {
|
||
|
return Err(ProofError::VerificationFailure);
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Blind showing the Invitation credential
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Reblind P and Q
|
||
|
let mut rng = rand::thread_rng();
|
||
|
let t = Scalar::random(&mut rng);
|
||
|
let P = t * inv_cred.P;
|
||
|
let Q = t * inv_cred.Q;
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Form Pedersen commitments to the blinded attributes
|
||
|
let zdate = Scalar::random(&mut rng);
|
||
|
let zbucket = Scalar::random(&mut rng);
|
||
|
let zblockages = Scalar::random(&mut rng);
|
||
|
let CDate = inv_cred.date * P + &zdate * Atable;
|
||
|
let CBucket = inv_cred.bucket * P + &zbucket * Atable;
|
||
|
let CBlockages = inv_cred.blockages * P + &zblockages * Atable;
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Form a Pedersen commitment to the MAC Q
|
||
|
// We flip the sign of zQ from that of the Hyphae paper so that
|
||
|
// the ZKP has a "+" instead of a "-", as that's what the zkp
|
||
|
// macro supports.
|
||
|
let negzQ = Scalar::random(&mut rng);
|
||
|
let CQ = Q - &negzQ * Atable;
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Compute the "error factor"
|
||
|
let V = zdate * invitation_pub.X[2]
|
||
|
+ zbucket * invitation_pub.X[3]
|
||
|
+ zblockages * invitation_pub.X[4]
|
||
|
+ &negzQ * Atable;
|
||
|
|
||
|
// User blinding for the Lox certificate to be issued
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Pick an ElGamal keypair
|
||
|
let d = Scalar::random(&mut rng);
|
||
|
let D = &d * Btable;
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Pick a random client component of the id
|
||
|
let id_client = Scalar::random(&mut rng);
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Encrypt it (times the basepoint B) to the ElGamal public key D we
|
||
|
// just created
|
||
|
let eid_client = Scalar::random(&mut rng);
|
||
|
let EncIdClient = (&eid_client * Btable, &id_client * Btable + eid_client * D);
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Encrypt the other blinded fields (times B) to D as well
|
||
|
let ebucket = Scalar::random(&mut rng);
|
||
|
let EncBucket = (&ebucket * Btable, &inv_cred.bucket * Btable + ebucket * D);
|
||
|
let eblockages = Scalar::random(&mut rng);
|
||
|
let EncBlockages = (
|
||
|
&eblockages * Btable,
|
||
|
&inv_cred.blockages * Btable + eblockages * D,
|
||
|
);
|
||
|
|
||
|
// The range proof that 0 <= diffdays <= 15
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Extract the 4 bits from diffdays
|
||
|
let g0: Scalar = (diffdays & 1).into();
|
||
|
let g1: Scalar = ((diffdays >> 1) & 1).into();
|
||
|
let g2: Scalar = ((diffdays >> 2) & 1).into();
|
||
|
let g3: Scalar = ((diffdays >> 3) & 1).into();
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Pick random factors for the Pedersen commitments
|
||
|
let wg0 = Scalar::random(&mut rng);
|
||
|
let zg1 = Scalar::random(&mut rng);
|
||
|
let wg1 = Scalar::random(&mut rng);
|
||
|
let zg2 = Scalar::random(&mut rng);
|
||
|
let wg2 = Scalar::random(&mut rng);
|
||
|
let zg3 = Scalar::random(&mut rng);
|
||
|
let wg3 = Scalar::random(&mut rng);
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Compute zg0 to cancel things out as
|
||
|
// zg0 = -(zdate + 2*zg1 + 4*zg2 + 8*zg3)
|
||
|
// but use Horner's method
|
||
|
let zg0 = -(scalar_dbl(&(scalar_dbl(&(scalar_dbl(&zg3) + zg2)) + zg1)) + zdate);
|
||
|
|
||
|
let yg0 = wg0 + g0 * zg0;
|
||
|
let yg1 = wg1 + g1 * zg1;
|
||
|
let yg2 = wg2 + g2 * zg2;
|
||
|
let yg3 = wg3 + g3 * zg3;
|
||
|
|
||
|
let CG0 = g0 * P + &zg0 * Atable;
|
||
|
let CG1 = g1 * P + &zg1 * Atable;
|
||
|
let CG2 = g2 * P + &zg2 * Atable;
|
||
|
let CG3 = g3 * P + &zg3 * Atable;
|
||
|
|
||
|
let CG0sq = g0 * P + &yg0 * Atable;
|
||
|
let CG1sq = g1 * P + &yg1 * Atable;
|
||
|
let CG2sq = g2 * P + &yg2 * Atable;
|
||
|
let CG3sq = g3 * P + &yg3 * Atable;
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Construct the proof
|
||
|
let mut transcript = Transcript::new(b"redeem invite request");
|
||
|
let piUser = requestproof::prove_compact(
|
||
|
&mut transcript,
|
||
|
requestproof::ProveAssignments {
|
||
|
A: &A,
|
||
|
B: &B,
|
||
|
P: &P,
|
||
|
CDate: &CDate,
|
||
|
CBucket: &CBucket,
|
||
|
CBlockages: &CBlockages,
|
||
|
V: &V,
|
||
|
Xdate: &invitation_pub.X[2],
|
||
|
Xbucket: &invitation_pub.X[3],
|
||
|
Xblockages: &invitation_pub.X[4],
|
||
|
D: &D,
|
||
|
EncIdClient0: &EncIdClient.0,
|
||
|
EncIdClient1: &EncIdClient.1,
|
||
|
EncBucket0: &EncBucket.0,
|
||
|
EncBucket1: &EncBucket.1,
|
||
|
EncBlockages0: &EncBlockages.0,
|
||
|
EncBlockages1: &EncBlockages.1,
|
||
|
CG0: &CG0,
|
||
|
CG1: &CG1,
|
||
|
CG2: &CG2,
|
||
|
CG3: &CG3,
|
||
|
CG0sq: &CG0sq,
|
||
|
CG1sq: &CG1sq,
|
||
|
CG2sq: &CG2sq,
|
||
|
CG3sq: &CG3sq,
|
||
|
date: &inv_cred.date,
|
||
|
bucket: &inv_cred.bucket,
|
||
|
blockages: &inv_cred.blockages,
|
||
|
zdate: &zdate,
|
||
|
zbucket: &zbucket,
|
||
|
zblockages: &zblockages,
|
||
|
negzQ: &negzQ,
|
||
|
d: &d,
|
||
|
eid_client: &eid_client,
|
||
|
ebucket: &ebucket,
|
||
|
eblockages: &eblockages,
|
||
|
id_client: &id_client,
|
||
|
g0: &g0,
|
||
|
g1: &g1,
|
||
|
g2: &g2,
|
||
|
g3: &g3,
|
||
|
zg0: &zg0,
|
||
|
zg1: &zg1,
|
||
|
zg2: &zg2,
|
||
|
zg3: &zg3,
|
||
|
wg0: &wg0,
|
||
|
wg1: &wg1,
|
||
|
wg2: &wg2,
|
||
|
wg3: &wg3,
|
||
|
yg0: &yg0,
|
||
|
yg1: &yg1,
|
||
|
yg2: &yg2,
|
||
|
yg3: &yg3,
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
)
|
||
|
.0;
|
||
|
|
||
|
Ok((
|
||
|
Request {
|
||
|
P,
|
||
|
id: inv_cred.inv_id,
|
||
|
CDate,
|
||
|
CBucket,
|
||
|
CBlockages,
|
||
|
CQ,
|
||
|
D,
|
||
|
EncIdClient,
|
||
|
EncBucket,
|
||
|
EncBlockages,
|
||
|
CG1,
|
||
|
CG2,
|
||
|
CG3,
|
||
|
CG0sq,
|
||
|
CG1sq,
|
||
|
CG2sq,
|
||
|
CG3sq,
|
||
|
piUser,
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
State {
|
||
|
d,
|
||
|
D,
|
||
|
EncIdClient,
|
||
|
EncBucket,
|
||
|
EncBlockages,
|
||
|
id_client,
|
||
|
bucket: inv_cred.bucket,
|
||
|
blockages: inv_cred.blockages,
|
||
|
},
|
||
|
))
|
||
|
}
|